Hi -- as many of you noticed, the last part of Problem 4 does not look so doable :)
The result is in fact true -- indeed, hardness for Set-Cover is known even subject to P NP. However the method illustrated probably won't cut it.
Please do one of the following instead:
1. Use this method to prove -hardness for Set-Cover, for as large a function as you can -- subject to NP not in DTIME() or an even better DTIME assumption.
OR
2. Prove -hardness for Set-Cover assuming NP not in BPTIME() -- using any method.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment